I mean let's face the facts here. The temperature went above zero...the heavy precip was delayed slightly. The west def scored early. Front seemed to stall out a bit..then BAMMMM. Kudos to the models. I'm more of a believer everytime they get it right!
Looking forward to our first 3 day stretch of sun and 20c++
Willoughby Langley at ~320ft / Similkameeeens ~3400ft
Hawk wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:52 am
I will try not to have such negative thinking this time so that a few members on here don't get upset and start crying
This is such pass-agg BS
2025-26 season stats:
Climo ∞ to 0.5 GFS
Season total: 0.5 cm and TWO traces!
Peak depth: 0.5 cm (01/07/2026)
Rubus_Leucodermis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 8:48 am
Another success for engaging the weenie mode yesterday evening!
I really don't have a great grasp on weather compared to many here. For example I don't truly understand dew points and their effects on snowfalls among many other things.
However I do kinda understand probabilities and after looking at literally hundreds of snow maps over the course of ten or so days, I could not understand how anyone thought there was widespread bust potential last night. That thing was picked and loaded on all models for most sections in the lm.
It's a good lesson in patience - no it's not busting because the snow didn't start 12 hours early, or because temps are .3 C warmer than modelled. And when there is model consensus, it's essentially happening. Models aren't always reliable but when there's consensus, they are.
Weather Dude wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:03 am
Deleted
Actually on second thought that is a counter example to everything I just said. For my memory dec 22 is one of the biggest busts here in a long time. So you could point to that and say model consensus fails. But it is exceedingly rare imo.
To add to the discussion if models were 100% accurate every single time I would believe them. But taking a few factors into consideration with one of them being the time of year being February 25 almost into March. Another one being temperatures being slightly warmer than forecast. And 0c snow. It wasnt -3c to start..it was +3c. Pitt Meadows read +4c on my vehicle actually. I didnt think we would get a pumbling like that
That was a tremendous event looking back now. Hindsight is 20/20 right?
Looking forward to our first 3 day stretch of sun and 20c++
Willoughby Langley at ~320ft / Similkameeeens ~3400ft
PortKells wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:06 am
Actually on second thought that is a counter example to everything I just said. For my memory dec 22 is one of the biggest busts here in a long time. So you could point to that and say model consensus fails. But it is exceedingly rare imo.
It was, sort of. Busts happen. But there wasn’t the level of model consensus there was with this one. The Euro had been on board for a big dumping for most of a week and the GFS for a week or more with last night’s snowfall. December’s snowfall involved more flipping and flopping in the lead-in.